Prop 8-Yes

Proposition 8 is to ban homosexuals from marrying. In the State of California homosexual couples are already given 'civil unions' which award them rights like heterosexual couples in marriage. The opponents to Proposition 8 blast the proponents of it as "intolerant," "bigots," religious nuts, and vulgar language, which I personally received when shaking my head at Prop 8 opponents protesting at the Orange Circle and giving a "pfff, please" sign, these angels of tolerance and equality cried out "fu*k you!!."
Gay marriage would have never been tolerated by the founder or framers of the state/Federal Constitution.
Homosexuality is unhealthy, this is an obvious fact which the opponents of Prop 8 downplay and ignore. There is a reason why the Red Cross and other centers that accept blood or plasma do not take male homosexuals as donors, they are a HIGH risk.
Homosexuality was considered a DISORDER by many

Props 4 -Yes

Proposition 4 requires a minor, under 18, to have her parents notified when procuring an abortion. The parents do not make the decision for the abortion. Clandestine abortions for minors have been used before for child predators to coverup their rapes of young girls, the last election there was a similar proposition that was put up but it failed, and there was audio available where the abortion clinics permitted young girls get abortions paid for by their adult "boyfriends." Planned Parenthood in many instances did not report the crimes.

Planned Parenthood has used the same exact TV in trying to convince people to vote no on it. They play on people's fears where a girl is beaten by her parents (for getting pregnant or getting an abortion??), this is faulty for a few reason.
1)Roe v Wade was passed in 1973 in part because it was argued that single mothers were frowned upon by society.
This is not the case anymore, its been estimated about 50% of children are now born to unwed mothers, maybe more in a liberal state like California. Planned Parenthood is using a fairly outdated arguement.
2)Most parents don't beat their children, they are saying don't pass 4 because of a case that is only maybe 1/100 at most. You don't not pass laws because of the minority of instances..
3)The girls are allowed to get an exception if they do come from abusive families, this is what was emphasized by this years version of 4. However abortions rights proponents ignore that, or when it is addressed they say its too burdensome, which is none sense.

Abortion rights groups and the Democratic Party, the Party of Death, assert Prop 4 is to take away a woman's right to choose. Which is garbage because
a) Females under 18 are not legally considered women, they are minors,
b)Parents are legally responsible for their childrens actions, why should abortion
be an exception?
c)Parents need to approve medical/surgical procedures, a minor cannot take tylenol
at school, or use an inhaler without a form by a doctor and or parent, why should
getting an abortion, which is far more dangerous, be an exception?
d)"Right to choose" is sophistry, it sounds nice but says nothing. The choice is
to slaughter a child, baby killing should not be even legally tolerated.

The Bishop of California have endorsed Proposition 4.

Slaves and Aborted Babies

"It is necessary to dehumanize a class of human beings before you can exploit or kill them."

Obama won't lower abortion rates

Barack Obama claimed before that he wants to make lowering abortion rates a platform in his party, despite telling Planned Parenthood he would sign into law the "Freedom of Choice Act" which would repeal abortion restriction, and would make abortions easier to get, and despite his campaigns efforts and speech before the Illinois Senate saying a fetus in or out of the womb should not be called a 'person', 'child' or 'human being,' despite telling Rick Warren in a forum in Lakeforest that he doesn't know when people get human rights since that issue was 'above his paygrade.' Despite his efforts to let even kids under 18 to get abortion which out having there parents know, something that protects child predators.

Most recently Obama answer this question by a proabortion rights group:

"Does Sen. Obama support continuing federal funding for crisis pregnancy centers? Why or why not?"

with this unexplained answer:

"No." http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2007/12/21/sen-barack-obamas-reproductive-health-questionnaire

Barack Obama claims he wants to lower pregnancy rates, but that was obviously a cheap ploy for votes and to win over voters that believe slaughtering kids is evil. Barack Obama changes his views and downplays them to fit the audience he is talking to. If Obama really wanted to lower abortion rate, Why does he OPPOSE funding Pregnancy Crisis Centers, if they are places that LOWER abortion rates by offering women alternatives to it?

Pictures from other blogs

Pontius Pilate, Prefect of the Roman Province of Judaea.
Loved to give speeches in front of Doric columns, oh wait that's Obama. Pilate said moral questions like the execution of the innocent were "above his pay grade," oh wait that's Obama too.

Kill it!!